Employers Feeling the Pinch From State Borrowing
In November, we released information about 21 states that missed the deadline to pay back outstanding loans they had borrowed from the federal government to cover unemployment benefits, resulting in a FUTA credit reduction, or in other words, higher taxes for employers in these states.
Although at the time the news only rippled in small shock waves, now that these bills are finally hitting the doorsteps of businesses across these states, employers are looking for answers. In Rhode Island, an article hit the news today about how employers are beginning to feel the effects, and why even the small changes in costs are bad for business. As one business owner, Bill Kitsilis, whose family owns Angelo’s Palace Pizza in Cumberland, stated in the GoLocalProv.com article: “Doing business in Rhode Island—it’s like being killed by a thousand cuts. It’s all these little extra costs of doing business that kill you in the long run.”
Rhode Island is just one of the many states that suffered from the same issue that ultimately lead to the borrowing, and now the higher taxes – the one small stone that has taken down these many state Goliaths – failure to keep up with the times. With a taxable wage base of just $7,000, the federal minimum for all states, the state has refused to raise unemployment taxes on employers for more than a decade. It was only a matter of time before an economic crisis plunged them into an unemployment funding deficit.
One proposed federal bill would finally raise the federal taxable wage base minimum for all states from $7,000 to $15,000 in 2014. States that have indexed their taxable wages over the years are likely at an appropriate level now and would remain unaffected. But thirty-four states (yes, 34) could potentially have to increase their taxable wage base up to $15,000, ultimately increasing taxes for employers in each of those states.
The responsibility lies in everyone’s hands now, though. States that have avoided the necessary tax increases will have to face the facts. And employers will have to get more savvy about their unemployment practices. Simple actions like documenting voluntary quits and performance-related discharges will help the states pay only legitimate unemployment claims, keeping their funding for the right candidates and keeping employers from seeing higher tax rates. Nonprofits with 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status should look into opting out of the unemployment tax system and find out whether it would be more cost-effective to just reimburse the state for their own former employees’ unemployment benefits (which is allowed by federal law in all states). The unemployment crisis wasn’t created in a day and it won’t be fixed in a day either. But with more attention on the issue, employers and states alike can see some light at the end of the tunnel.
If you are a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization, click here to find out if opting out of the state unemployment tax system could save you money.
